The economics, counted conservatively
06 · Economic effect An ROI canvas for one site with one foreman. We count only reporting time; rework, disputes and theft stay out of the conservative scenario — they come on top.
| Parameter | Value | Source / assumption |
| Process and class | progress control and reporting — class B | litcore framework, block 2 · lever: errors/disputes + time |
| Volume | 1 site, 1 foreman | [estimate] — refined during the audit |
| Reporting «before» | 3–4 h/wk: sorting photos, writing back to owner and client | [estimate] — measured during the audit |
| Reporting «after» | ~1 h/wk: reviewing flags and digests | [estimate] — fixed in the pilot |
| Time lever | ~10 h/month × €28/h ≈ €280/month | [estimate]; the rate — your real one |
| Rework and disputes | rework ≈ 5% of the contract — reserve | GIRI, 2016 [I]; not in the conservative scenario |
| Site theft | less loss of materials and tools — reserve | not in the conservative scenario |
| Costs | Start from €590 + €49/mo; camera installation separate | «from» price — approved by the owner |
PAYBACK≈ 4 months. Start at €590 with ~€280/month saved on the foreman's reporting, on a 40/70/100% adoption curve over 3 months [estimate]. One avoided rework or one dispute won over hidden work pays the setup back at a stroke — but that is reserve, it stays out of the maths.
Adoption: every site's photos and frames go to the timeline instead of sinking in a chatTime: the foreman's reporting hours, before/afterQuality: issues caught before the work is closed up; disputes settled with a dated frameConvenience: the owner sees the site without a trip or a call
Not financial advice: the calculation is a proposal built on market reference points; final figures are fixed after the audit and a pilot on your site.
Want this calculated on your numbers? Request a proposal →